I have a question about the CDJ200/400. I got alot of Mp3-files on my external hdd, its formated as NTFS. So i want to know what is better for me. Burn my mp3-files as *.wav on a CD or as *.mp3. Some tracks on a CD i burned dont work on my CDJ-200 (get my CDJ400 on christmas). Is it better to use normal cds or mp3cds with a CDJ? All the CDs i bought work fine on it. (sorry for my bad english)
What do you think about CDJ-200 and MP3-CDs ??
Vote :
OK we understand you don't like ads (so don't we) but, Please consider making this website possible by disabling your Ad Blocker. Or become a Gold Member, they don't see ads.
I think working with normal audio cd's is the best. Why? -the cd player reads these cd's faster -the pitch range with mp3 files is maximum 16%
but it's your own choise. -On an MP3 cd you can orden your music in different folders and search in it (works fast and easy) -Less work to burn 1 mp3 cd than maybe 3 or 4 MP3 cd's (depends on how big your tracks are of course)
CDJ-200 does not read WAV written ad data on a CD, make proper Audio CD's instead.
That's the way to go, I never use MP3 CD's in the deck, no matter how good the decks are, MP3 just works slower than real audio CD's. Also the pitch and some loop functionality works better for audio CD's.
ow dus het is zo simpel..ik ga er eens naar kijken!..tnX
This is an old Topic
No new postings for 5.743 days. Post CommentThat would be 191.4 months or a whopping 15.7 years You might consider opening a new topic or reply anyway by pressing the green button...
OK we understand you don't like ads (so don't we) but, Please consider making this website possible by disabling your Ad Blocker. Or become a Gold Member, they don't see ads.